If you want to talk about theology, you got to use god concept. If you want to talk about computer, use the right concept too.

Anyway, I don’t use those theist concept here.

and how is that openness will answer how a working computer program can be made without any programmers – isn’t it looks just like a ‘random’ order of bits data? then try change the computer program to the orderly harmony of universe..

I prefer to call all things beyond our control just as nature. As long you live in the world, you obey to the rule of nature of the world no matter how smart or how powerful you are.

To call nature as god? Well, why should I? Because some religions said so? I don’t have to take dogma and take it as a blind faith.

I chose to keep my eyes open and question everything instead of wearing the glasses of dogma.

Thanks mate!

Just wanna throw in my two cents worth.

Let’s think about something beyond our control, i.e. thunderstorm or the roar of the oceans.
Do you think the most intelligent human creature live on this earth will be able to take control on those things?
Don’t you think these things indicate that there’s something more powerful, more intelligent as compared to us, human being.

People may refer it as God, or whatever they like. But bottom line, people will admit that there’s something greater than us.

Death is another evidence that human being can’t have a full control over themselves.

Keep on writing mate!

Eka

Tapi yang dirujuk “tuhan” oleh theisme apakah benar si Baka Brahma? Sepertinya sih hanya tokoh/konsep yg diciptakan yg kebetulan sepandangan dengan Baka Brahma yang mengakui dirinya yg immortal dan semua dibawah kekuasannya.

Bedanya satu sebagai si subjek yg menciptakan objek yg demikian. Yang satunya lagi si objek sendiri yg menyangka dirinya yang demikian.